A silver first-generation Chrysler 300C on a wet, deserted downtown street at blue hour

History · 1998–2007

The merger of equals.

For nine years and thirty-six billion dollars, Daimler-Benz and Chrysler tried to become one company. The phrase in the press release was the first thing to break.

On 12 January 1998, in a suburb of Detroit, Jürgen Schrempp walked into Robert Eaton's office, sat down at a coffee table and proposed that Daimler-Benz and Chrysler become a single company. He was out again seventeen minutes later.

Four months after that the two chairmen stood side by side in London and announced the largest industrial merger in history. Ten months after it, DaimlerChrysler AG existed: 441,502 employees, two head offices an ocean apart, and one phrase from the press release — a merger of equals — that would end up being argued over in a federal court.

Chapter I · January–November 1998

Seventeen minutes in Auburn Hills

Schrempp did not warm up. He had assessed both companies, he told Eaton, and they fitted perfectly — by product, by geography, by everything. Then he invited Eaton to tell him it was nonsense. Eaton smiled and said he would call within two weeks.

It was not a cold call. Eaton had been arguing for months that of the thirty-odd carmakers then in business only a handful would survive the coming decade, and that Chrysler could not outspend Ford and General Motors forever. Its health was not in doubt: in 1998 the Chrysler, Plymouth, Jeep and Dodge division booked record revenues of €56.3 billion, comfortably more than Mercedes-Benz took in the same year.

In February the two sides met in Geneva, where Eaton set out three conditions: the best possible price for his shareholders, no tax bill for them, and a merger of equals. The first two were easiest to satisfy by incorporating the combined company in Germany as an Aktiengesellschaft — which quietly settled the question of where power would live. Eaton then fought over the name. He wanted Chrysler first and lost; what he won instead was the deletion of Benz, so that the company carrying the name of the man who built the first automobile became simply DaimlerChrysler.

They signed on 6 May and announced it in London the next day. Schrempp called it the perfect fit of two market leaders; Eaton said the products and brands complemented each other. The release promised $1.4 billion of benefits in 1999 and $3 billion a year within several years, a 28% premium for Chrysler shareholders — and, in the same document, no plant closures and no lay-offs.

Shareholders approved in September. On 17 November 1998 the new shares began trading in New York at $84.31 under the ticker DCX, and on 6 January 1999 they touched $108.62. On paper DaimlerChrysler was the fifth largest carmaker in the world by volume and the third by revenue. Assembling it had taken fewer than 200 working days.

Paid for Chrysler
$36 bn
Employees, end of 1998
441,502
Premium to Chrysler holders
28 %
Share peak, January 1999
$108.62
A black Plymouth Prowler on a deserted six-lane boulevard at night
Chrysler in 1998 was confident enough to build a factory hot rod. Plymouth, the brand that sold it, was condemned barely a year after the merger closed.

Chapter II · 1999–2000

One company, two companies

The integration had a name — post-merger integration — teams on both sides of the Atlantic and a genuine attempt at a common culture. It also had the odds against it, and everyone involved knew the numbers. A KPMG study of the period found that 83% of mergers produced no gain in shareholder value at all; Daimler-Benz's own research put the failure rate at 70%.

What failed was not the strategy. It was that two companies which did everything differently — how a decision was made, how long a meeting ran, how much a manager was paid, how a report was written — were asked to behave as one while both were still keeping score. Thomas Stallkamp, made Chrysler's president days before Schrempp's visit, was gone by September 1999. By late 2000 more than a dozen of Chrysler's most senior executives had resigned, retired or been pushed out, and the American half of a merger of equals was being run from Stuttgart.

Then the money turned. On 26 October 2000 Chrysler reported a third-quarter loss of $512 million. Four days later the Financial Times published an interview with Schrempp.

30 October 2000

For psychological reasons.

"The structure we have now with Chrysler as a standalone division was always the structure I wanted," Schrempp told the paper. "We had to go a roundabout way but it had to be done for psychological reasons. If I had gone and said Chrysler would be a division, everybody on their side would have said: there is no way we'll do a deal."

Four weeks later Kirk Kerkorian — who had voted his 13.75% of Chrysler in favor of the deal — sued DaimlerChrysler and Schrempp for $9 billion and asked a federal court to unwind the merger. On 17 November 2000, two years to the day after the merger closed, Chrysler's president James Holden was fired and Dieter Zetsche was flown in from Stuttgart to replace him.

Chapter III · 2001–2004

Fixing Detroit from Stuttgart

Zetsche arrived with Wolfgang Bernhard and, on 29 January 2001, with the bill. Chrysler would shed 26,000 jobs, about a fifth of its workforce, and idle six plants. "No one wants this to happen," Zetsche said. "I personally wish it didn't have to happen." The press release of May 1998 had promised the opposite in writing.

It worked, for a while: Chrysler was making money again by 2004. And the merger finally began to produce things you could drive rather than synergies you could only read about.

The Chrysler Crossfire of 2003 was the most literal expression of it — an American sports coupé on the platform of the Mercedes-Benz R170 SLK, sharing roughly 39% of its parts with it, assembled by Karmann in Osnabrück.

The Chrysler 300C that followed a year later was the better car and the better argument: an unmistakably American rear-drive sedan riding on the W211 E-Class's rear suspension geometry and shifting through a Mercedes five-speed automatic. It sold, and it made the case for the merger more convincingly than nine years of press releases.

Traffic ran the other way too. The Mercedes-Benz W903 Sprinter was sold in the United States wearing Dodge badges — shipped from Düsseldorf partly dismantled and screwed back together in South Carolina, because a van finished in America escaped the 25% tariff on imported light trucks.

Jobs cut from 2001
26,000
Plants idled
6
Shared with the SLK
39 %
Last Plymouth built
2001
A graphite gray Chrysler Crossfire coupé on wet cobbles among brick warehouses at dawn
The Crossfire: a Chrysler badge, an SLK floorpan and a German coachbuilder. Roughly two parts in five came from Mercedes-Benz.
A plain white Dodge Sprinter high-roof van at a floodlit American truck stop at dusk
The Sprinter sold as a Dodge — the merger running in the opposite direction.

Chapter IV · 2000–2005

Welt AG

Chrysler was never the whole plan. Schrempp wanted a Welt AG — a world corporation with a division on every continent. In 2000 DaimlerChrysler paid about €2.1 billion for 34% of Mitsubishi Motors and took 10.5% of Hyundai. On the map it was finished. In the accounts it was not.

Mitsubishi's losses grew faster than the savings; in April 2004 the board refused to put in more money and the stake was wound down, and the Hyundai holding went the same year. Stuttgart was funding its own ambitions in the meantime — Maybach was relaunched in 2002 — while the division that paid for everything began to slip. Electronics and warranty complaints dogged the W220 S-Class generation, and in April 2005 the Mercedes Car Group posted its first quarterly loss in more than ten years. That September it cut 8,500 jobs in Germany.

On 7 April 2005 a federal judge in Delaware ruled for DaimlerChrysler: Kerkorian had not proved fraud. Schrempp had won the argument he started himself, and for which he had already apologised. On 28 July he announced he would leave at the end of the year. His successor was Zetsche, the man he had sent to Detroit.

What Daimler paid for Chrysler in 1998

$ 36 bn

Nine years later it sold 80.1% of it for $7.4 billion — of which $1.35 billion actually reached Stuttgart.

Chapter V · 2006–2007

Dr. Z, and the way out

Zetsche's first year as chairman opened with 6,000 white-collar jobs cut worldwide and, improbably, with a starring role in Chrysler's American advertising. As Dr. Z he appeared on television vouching for German engineering in cars built in Detroit — a German chief executive selling the merger to the country that had come off worst from it. The campaign lasted about a year. Chrysler lost $1.5 billion in 2006 and slipped behind Toyota in its home market.

On 14 February 2007 Zetsche told investors he would not rule out any option for Chrysler, including a sale. Chrysler announced 13,000 more job cuts the same day. The shares rose 5%. That was the verdict: the market paid more for the prospect of undoing the merger than it had ever paid for the merger itself.

On 14 May the buyer was named. Cerberus Capital Management, a New York private-equity firm, would contribute €5.5 billion — $7.4 billion — for 80.1% of a new company called Chrysler Holding LLC. Only $1.35 billion of it went to DaimlerChrysler; $5 billion went into Chrysler itself and $1.05 billion into its finance arm. Once the pension and healthcare liabilities and the $1.5 billion of debt Daimler agreed to subscribe were counted, selling Chrysler cost Daimler money.

The deal closed on 3 August 2007 and Daimler kept 19.9%. At an extraordinary shareholders' meeting in Berlin on 4 October, DaimlerChrysler AG became Daimler AG. The name had taken ten months and thirty-six billion dollars to assemble; it was dismantled by a show of hands.

A black WK-generation Jeep Grand Cherokee alone on a wet, empty car park in winter
Jeep was the asset Daimler had wanted most. In 2007 it went to a private-equity firm with the rest of Chrysler.

Nine years

From a coffee table in Auburn Hills to a show of hands in Berlin.

  1. 1998

    Seventeen minutes

    12 January: Schrempp proposes the merger to Eaton at the Detroit auto show and is out of the office again seventeen minutes later.

  2. 1998

    DCX

    17 November: DaimlerChrysler shares begin trading in New York at $84.31. The company has 441,502 employees and two head offices.

  3. 2000

    The admission

    30 October: Schrempp tells the Financial Times that Chrysler was always meant to be a division, and that the merger of equals was for psychological reasons.

  4. 2001

    26,000

    29 January: Zetsche cuts a fifth of Chrysler's workforce and idles six plants. The last Plymouth is built the same year.

  5. 2005

    Succession

    7 April: Kerkorian loses in Delaware. On 28 July Schrempp announces his departure; Zetsche takes over in January.

  6. 2007

    The exit

    3 August: Cerberus takes 80.1% of Chrysler. On 4 October the company is renamed Daimler AG.

Epilogue

What it cost, what it left

Chrysler under Cerberus lasted twenty months before the financial crisis arrived. It filed for bankruptcy in 2009, Daimler surrendered its remaining 19.9%, and the company was rebuilt under Fiat's control — becoming Fiat Chrysler and then, in 2021, part of Stellantis. Daimler AG dropped the Daimler name in 2022 and became Mercedes-Benz Group AG. Neither half of DaimlerChrysler still trades under the name it carried in 1998.

The hardware outlived the company. The Sprinter still wears a three-pointed star on American roads, and the rear-drive architecture Mercedes lent to the 300C stayed in production for well over a decade. What did not survive was the premise: that two companies can be added together without one of them being subtracted.

The most honest sentence anyone produced in those nine years came from Schrempp, in an interview he later apologised for. He was telling the truth about the structure he had always wanted. What he had misjudged was what it would cost to get it.

← All history features